Wednesday, 21 September 2016

Week 5: Wiki 8-week Training Plan


This week I will be showing how wiki can be integrated into a program that the JDF can use to review some of the policies that have existed for years. A policy review requires participants to engage in critical thinking. These policy reviews would fall within the context of what West and West (2009) refers to as “Debates” and “Nominal Group Technique”. This will allow them to use two different methods of using wikis. .   

There are five key policy documents that will be reviewed: the Fitness Policy, the Drug Abuse Policy, the Sexual Harassment Policy, Housing Policy, and the Education Policy.  The program will be conducted online since the participants are generally in disparate places, and will not be able to collaborate directly throughout the work week. Face-to-face sessions will occur on three occasions: weeks 1, 5 and 8.  

Title of the lesson/training             Review of JDF Policies

Target audience                              Military Officers at the level of Captain (1 from all 8 units).

The Aim of the program:                To have a mid-level management perspective of current policies and the possible changes required.

Learning/Training objectives       At the end of the program, participants should have:
              1. Become more familiar with the 5 key policies
              2. Gain a balanced perspective on the policies
              3. Express views on the policies that are based on evidence and research
              4. Critically evaluate opposing sides of an issue
              5. Produced a final review that can be used for further analysis
Rationale for the use of wiki:           Wikis provide a collaborative tool to support critical thinking (West and West, 2009).            

Week
Topic
Key Learning  Activities
One
 
Program commencement
(Face-to-face)
Ø  Overview of the five policies
Ø  Introduction to wikis and how to use it for collaboration
Ø  Use of wiki “Debate” style
Ø  Assign readings for Fitness Policy
Two
 
 
Fitness Policy
Ø  Use wiki to collaborate critically assess the Fitness Policy and come up with a group position to be shared at the mid-program face-to-face
Ø  Use of wiki “Debate” style
Ø  Assign readings for Drug Abuse Policy
Three
Drug Abuse Policy
 
Ø  Use wiki to collaborate critically assess the Drug  Abuse Policy and come up with a group position to be shared at the mid-program face-to-face
Ø  Use of “Debate” style
Ø  Assign readings for the Sexual Harassment Policy
Four
Sexual Harassment Policy
 
Ø  Use wiki to collaborate critically assess the Sexual Harassment Policy and come up with a group position to be shared at the mid-program face-to-face
Ø  Use of “Debate” style
Ø  Have participants do group assessment of individual contribution and use of wiki
Five
Mid-program review and assessments
(Face-to-face)
Ø  Discuss the group’s review and proposals
Ø  Review the use of wiki
Ø  Discussion of “Nominal Group Technique”.
Ø  Assign readings for the Housing Policy
Six
Housing Policy
 
Ø  Use wiki to collaborate critically assess the Housing Policy and come up with a group position to be shared at the mid-program face-to-face
Ø  “Nominal Group Technique”.
Ø  Assign readings for the Education Policy
Seven
Education Policy
 
Ø  Use wiki to collaborate critically assess the Education Policy and come up with a group position to be shared at the mid-program face-to-face
Ø  “Nominal Group Technique”.
Ø  Have participants do group assessment of individual contribution and use of wiki
Eight
Wrap up
(Face-to-face)
Final discussions on:
The 5 policies
Use of wikis
Evaluation of the work
 

Wiki Activity Evaluation: This will be done by self and group assessment.  Participants’ contribution will be judged based on a scale of “Above Average”, “Average”, “Below Average”.  Areas that will be considered will include: Quality of contribution, Response time to other contribution, frequency of contribution and use of wiki tools.




References

West, J. & M. West (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration: The power of the read-write web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Week 4: Wikis


Welcome back to my Blog. Today I want to discuss wikis.

According to West and West (2009) a wiki is a collaborative web space where anyone can add content and anyone can edit content that has already been published (p. 3).  A wiki facilitates collaboration. It allows groups to collaborate, share and build online content, and is especially useful for distance learners who are separated by time and space (West and West 2009).  According to King and Cox (2011) “wiki are the perfect tool for collaboration, as they are easily editable” (p. 121). I can attest to this fact, having done a wiki project before.  Added to that is the fact that I am in a different country from all my classmates.

There are a number of advantages to using a wiki as a collaboration tool.  They are practical (allowing for collaboration); political (allowing freedom of participation; and, timely (providing up-to-date content) (King and Cox 2011 p. 126).  As an asynchronous form of communication, it compares favorably against other similar types of communication, including blogs and threaded discussion, especially when collaboration is the objective.  

There are different types of wikis and they carry various disadvantages.  Some offer minimal management capabilities, others provide limited security, and some come at a cost. From a personal perspective, having worked on a wiki project, my greatest fear was ‘spoiling’ the wiki page or removing something that shouldn’t be removed.  This worry may cause other me and other persons to not be as active in using this excellent adult learning technology.

Below is a great YouTube link that gives an easy explanation of using wikis.


References:

King, K. & T. Cox (2011). The professor’s guide to taming technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

West, J. & M. West (2009). Using Wikis for online collaboration: The power of the read-write web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Wednesday, 7 September 2016

Week 3: Weblogs


Welcome to my first blog!!! It is interesting that the essence of this ground breaking first blog of mine, is to discuss blogging, comparing it with discussion boards (which I have used before) and look at pros and cons of blogging. From what I have read so far, blogging can be used in several ways to support adult education.  I do hope that I will be able to use it wisely and effectively.


Blogging is similar to discussion boards activities.  However, although there are many similarities with discussion board activities there are some differences.  One similarity between a blog and a discussion board activity is that readers can comment on posted entries, which are dated. Another similarity is that they both allow for reflective practice by the author and also persons who write on the blog.  Oravec (2002) also highlighted that educators can use blogs as sources of information on important topics and as modes of online classroom interaction. Again, this is similar to how discussion board activities are generally used. 


The main difference between a blog and a discussion board activity is that the blog is accessible by the public worldwide, whilst the discussion board usually is designed to be private and are usually a part of a LMS.  Once a blog is created and exist on the web, then it is there for public viewing.  The blogger is not then able to restrict who can access it (although I have seen where one can use the options to limit readers' ability to comment). Another subtle difference that I have noted is the reverse chronological listing of entries in a blog, which is not the same for the discussion board activities that I have participated in. According to King and Cox (2011), blogs allow for entries to be searched, archived and categorized. 


Blogging like other forms of technology can play a significant role in adult learning.  However, it has pros and cons (which are similar to other forms of technology). One advantage is its use in reflective practice and journaling. On the other hand, the major drawback is the inability to control who views/accesses the blog – although this has certain positive aspects to blogging as well.

 King, K. P., & Cox, T. D. (Eds.). (2011). The professor's guide to taming technology:  Leveraging digital media, Web 2.0, and more for learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. 

 Oravec, J.A. (2002). Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616-621.